Text-Based Modeling Strategy (TBMS) in Teaching Writing Skills: The Indonesian Context

Yayat Sudaryat

Abstract


ABSTRACT: This study was based on the issue that the Indonesia high school student’s writing ability was still low. Therefore, it was needed to find out the factors causing the problem and solution to overcome in through the implementation of the Text-Based Modelling Strategy (TBMS). The study used the experimental methods with the Randomized Pretest-Posttest Comparison Group Design. The data were collected in the forms of essay, questionnaire, interviews result, document, and observation result. The main sources of the data were the students of SMA YAS (Sekolah Menengah Atas Yayasan Atikan Sunda or Senior High School of the Sundanese Education Foundation) in Bandung. Beside, the Indonesian teacher and some documents from the school saced as the additional source of the data. The result of this study proved that the TBMS could overcome the hindrance of writing, and it was also effective in increasing the students competence of writing an essay. The result was also valid for significance value of the essay writing aspect’s competence (substantive, textual, lexical, syntactic, and graphemic). Though they altogether increased the writing competence, it was seen that the TBMS was much better and more effectictive than the BMS (Basic Modeling Strategy) and CLS (Conventional Learning Strategy). The study found that the procedure composed and applied in the TBMS, that has never done before, contributed positively to the increasing of writing competence.

KEY WORDS: Learning and teaching strategy, modeling, Text-Based Modelling Strategy, essays, and writing competence.

About the Author: Dr. Yayat Sudaryat is a Lecturer at the Department of Sundanese Language Education, Faculty of Language and Art Education UPI (Indonesia University of Education), Jalan Dr. Setiabudhi No.229, Bandung 40154, West Java, Indonesia. He can be reached at: kisudaryat_sunda@yahoo.com

How to cite this article? Sudaryat, Yayat. (2010). “Text-Based Modeling Strategy (TBMS) in Teaching Writing Skills: The Indonesian Context” in EDUCARE: International Journal for Educational Studies, Vol.3(1) August, pp.85-102. Bandung, Indonesia: Minda Masagi Press owned by ASPENSI in Bandung, West Java; and FKIP UMP in Purwokerto, Central Java, ISSN 1979-7877.

Chronicle of the article: Accepted (June 25, 2010); Revised (July 25, 2010); and Published (August 17, 2010).


Full Text:

PDF

References


Agustien, Helena I.R. (2006). “Genre-Based Approach and the 2004 English Curriculum”. Paper presented at UPI [Indonesia University of Education] National Seminar, Bandung, on 27 February.

Alwasilah, Adeng Chaedar & Seni Susana Alwasilah. (2005). Pokoknya Menulis. Bandung: Kiblat.

Article on “Modeling Theory” in Google at http://www.as.wvu.edu [accessed in Bandung, Indonesia: on 20 May 2010].

Atmowiloto, Arswendo. (2001). Mengarang itu Gampang. Jakarta: Gramedia.

Bachman, Lyle F. (1990). Fundamental Consideration in Language Testing. New York: Oxford University Press.

Bandura, Albert. (1962). “Social Learning Through Imitation” in M. Jones [ed]. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press, pp.211-269.

Bandura, Albert. (1977). Social Learning Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice- Hall.

Bazerman, C. (1997). “The Life of Genre, the Life in the Classroom” in W. Bishop & H. Ostrom [eds]. Genre and Writing: Issues, Arguments, and Alternatives. Posthmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook, pp.19-29.

Beck, E.E. (1993). A Survey of Experiences of Collaborative Writing. London: Springer-Verlag, pp.87-112.

Blair, R.W. [ed]. (1982). Innovative Approaches to Language Teaching. Rowley: Newbury House Publishers, Inc.

Brown, H.D. (1994). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. London: Prentice-Hall.

Buchori, Mochtar. (2001). Pendidikan Antisipatoris. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.

Bull, Susan & Simon Shurville. (1992). Cooperative Writer Modeling: Facilitating Reader-Based Writing with Scrawl. Falmer, East Sussex: School of Languages, University of Brighton.

Byrne, D. (1979). Teaching Writing Skill. London: Longman.

Celce-Murcia, M. (2000). Teaching English: A Second or Foreign Language? New York: Newbury House/Harper-Collins.

Chomsky, Noam. (1965). Aspects of the Theory of the Syntax. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Crystal, David. (1985). A First Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics. London: Andre Deutsch Ltd.

Davies, L.K. (1981). Instructional Technique. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Dixon-Krauss, L. (2000). “A Mediation Model for Dynamic Literacy Instruction”. On line also available at http://www.mannlib.cornel.edu/-pmd8/literacy/Assembly/html [accessed in Bandung, Indonesia: on 4 February 2010].

Greene, H.A. & W.T. Petty. (1976). Developing Language Skills in the Elementary Schools. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, Inc.

Hammond, J. et al. (1992). English for Special Purpose: A Handbook for Teachers of Adult Literacy. Sydney: NCELTR, Macquarie University.

Harmer, J. (2002). The Practice English Language Teaching. London: Longman.

Hayland, K. (2004). Genre and Second Language Writing. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.

Heaton, J.B. (1995). Writing English Language Tests. London: Longman.

Heller, M.F. (1991). Reading Writing Connections from Theory to Practice. New York: Longman Publishing Group.

Hutchinson T. & A. Waters. (1987). English Specific Purpose: A Learning-Centered Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Imran, Ahda. (2000). “Keterampilan Menulis Indonesia Paling Rendah di Asia” in daily newspaper of Pikiran Rakyat. Bandung: 26 October.

Irwin, Judith W. & Mary Anne Doyle. (1992). Reading and Writing Connections: Learning from Research. Delaware: IRA.

Joyce, B. & M. Weil. (2002). Models of Teaching. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Kern, R. (2000). Literacy and Language Teaching. London: CU Press.

Mackey, W.F. (1968). Language Teaching Analysis. London: Longman.

Maslakhah, S. (2005). “Menulis Tidak Semudah Membaca” in Wiedarti [ed]. Menuju Budaya Menulis. Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana.

McRobert, R. (1981). Writing Workshop: A Student’s Guide to the Craft of Writing. Australia: The McMillan Company.

Mozombite, Amy. (1996). “Teaching the Compare and Contrast Essay through Modeling”. Online also available at http://www.w3.org/pub/WWW/Protocols/ Specs.html# [accessed in Bandung, Indonesia: on 17 February 2010].

Neman, B.S. (1989). Writing Effectively. New York: Harper & Row.

Nunan, David. (1991). Language Teaching Methodology. New York: Prentice Hall.

Nurgiyantoro, Burhan. (2001). Penilaian dalam Pengajaran Bahasa dan Sastra. Yogyakarta: BPFE.

Nurhadi & Agus Gerrad Senduk. (2003). Pembelajaran Kontekstual dan Penerapannya dalam KBK. Malang, Jawa Timur: Penerbit UNM [Universitas Negeri Malang].

Ochs, Elinor. (1994). “Planned and Unplanned Discourse” in G.E. Tompkins [ed]. Teaching Writing: Balancing Process and Product. McMillan: College Publication, p.51-80.

O’Malley, M. & A.U. Chamot. (1990). Learning Strategies in Second Language Acquisition. New York: Cambridge University Press.

O’Shea, R.P. (2000). Writing for Psychology. Sydney: Harcourt.

Oshima, A. & A. Hogue. (1999). Writing Academic English. London: Longman.

Oxford, R. (1990). Language Learning Strategies. New York: Newbury House.

Proet, J. & K. Gill. (1986). The Writing Process in Action: A Handbook for Teachers. Urbana: NCTE.

Richards, J.C. & T.S. Rodgers. (1993). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Stratton, C.R. (1984). Technical Writing: Process and Product. New York: CBS College.

Tompkins, G.E. & K. Hoskisson. (1991). Language Arts. New York: McMillan Publication.

Tompkins, G.E. [ed]. (1994). Teaching Writing: Balancing Process and Product. McMillan: College Publication.

Wiedarti, Pangesti [ed]. (2005). Menuju Budaya Menulis. Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana.


EDUCARE: International Journal for Educational Studies. Ciptaan disebarluaskan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-BerbagiSerupa 4.0 Internasional