ABSTRACT: The perception held by academic staff of programme re-accreditation has been a major problem in Higher Education Institutions. Academics are concerned about the influence of the government in their daily operation, while the government claim that they want to be accountable to the public for money spent on Higher Education Institutions. To a large extent, academics believe that the role of the government amounts to interference rather than being accountable, and that the academic freedom has been violated. The participants of the study were academics from the 23 South African universities. Questionnaires, documentary analysis, and interviews were used as the main data collection instruments. The study revealed that a negative perception amongst academic staff existed with regard to programme re-accreditation. Furthermore, the study also established that it is still difficult for academic staff to identify the difference between the role played by the government (accountability) and their own role (academic freedom). It was interesting to note that although academics want to participate in the programme re-accreditation, however, they still have a fear of failure. Those fears foster a negative re-accreditation concept among academics in the HE. For that matter, academics will create a platform to hide their failure. The article further recommends that the first step in programme re-accreditation should perhaps be in the form of improvement or enhancement of quality.

KEY WORDS: Programme re-accreditation and self-evaluation, academic staffs’ perception, role of the government, and improvement or enhancement of the Higher Education quality.

===

About the Author: Dr. Jacob M. Selesho is the Head of Postgraduate Studies in Education, Central University of Technology (CUT), Free State, Bloemfontein, Republic of South Africa. He can be reached at: jselesho@cut.ac.za

How to cite this article? Selesho, Jacob M. (2010). “The Perception of Academic Staff in Relation to Programme Re-Accreditation in South African Higher Education Institutions” in EDUCARE: International Journal for Educational Studies, Vol.3(1) August, pp.1-10. Bandung, Indonesia: Minda Masagi Press owned by ASPENSI in Bandung, West Java; and FKIP UMP in Purwokerto, Central Java, ISSN 1979-7877.

Chronicle of the article: Accepted (June 11, 2010); Revised (July 11, 2010); and Published (August 17, 2010).

Abbott, P. (2007). QA and Enhancement in Small State: The Case of Rwanda. Paris: UNESCO [United Nations for Education, Social and Cultural Organization].

Bless, C., C. Higson-Smith & A. Kagee. (2007). Fundamental of Social Research Methods: An African Perspective. Cape Town: Juta and Company, fourth edition.

Education White Paper 3. (1997). A Programme for the Transformation of HE [High Education]. Pretoria: Department of Education.

Harvey, L. (2004). “The Power of Accreditation: Views of Academics” in Journal of HE Policy and Management, 26(2), pp.207–223.

Harvey, L. & J. Newton. (2005). “Transforming Quality Evaluation in HE” in Quality in HE, 10(2), pp.77-91.

HEFCE [High Education Funding Council for England]. (2003). Further Development of the Method for the Assessment of the Quality of Education. London, UK: 2/3 [June].

High Education Act 101 of 1997. Cape Town, South Africa: Department of Education, 1997.

HEQC [High Education Quality Committee]. (2003). Communiqué to HE Institution and Other Stakeholders. Pretoria: Council for HE.

HEQC [High Education Quality Committee]. (2004a). Framework for Institutional Audits. Pretoria: Council for HE.

HEQC [High Education Quality Committee]. (2004b). Communiqué on Plans and Activities for 2004. Pretoria: Council for HE.

Kowalkiewicz, A. (2007). “The Impact of Quality Culture on Quality Teaching: A Case of Business HE in Poland, Embedding Quality Culture in HE”. A Selection of Papers from the 1st European Forum for QA [Quality Assurace], Technische Universitat Munchen, Germany.

Kristoffersen, D. (2003). Denmark in Educational Evaluation around the World: An International Anthology. Copenhagen: The Danish Evaluation Institute, ISBN 877958-132-3.

Lewis, R. (2006). Guidelines of Good Practice: International Network of Quality Assurance Agencies in HE. Pretoria: Council for HE.

NCHE [National Commission on High Education]. (1996). A Framework for Transformation. Pretoria: HRSC.

NPHE [National Plan for High Education]. (2001). Pretoria: Department of Education.

Newton, J. (2007). “What is Quality? Embedding Quality Culture in HE”. A Selection of Papers from the 1st European Forum for QA [Quality Assurance], Technische Universitat Munchen, Germany.

Republic of South Africa. (1995). South African Qualification Authority Act (Act 58 of 1995). Pretoria: Government Printer.

Stensaker, B. & L. Harvey. (2004). “New Wine in Old Bottles or Was it the Other Way Around? A Comparison of Public and Private Accreditation Schemes in HE”. Paper at the CHER Conference, Enschede, 17–19 September.

Stensaker, B. (2007). “Impact of Quality Processes: Embedding Quality Culture in HE”. A Selection of Papers from the 1st European Forum for QA [Quality Assurance], Technische Universitat Munchen, Germany.

Schwarz, S. & D.F. Westerheijden. (2004). Accreditation and Evaluation in the European HE Area. Dorndrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher.

Vettori, O. (2007). “Dealing with Ambivalences-Strategic Option for Nurturing a Quality Culture in Teaching and Learning: Embedding Quality Culture in HE”. A Selection of Papers from the 1st European Forum for QA [Quality Assurance], Technische Universitat Munchen, Germany.

Vlãsceanu, L., L. Grünberg & D. Pârlea. (2004). QA and Accreditation: A Glossary of Basic Terms and Definitions. Bucharest: UNESCO-CEPES Papers on HE, ISBN 92-9069-178-6.

Woodhouse, D. (2006). “The Role of QA Agencies in High Education in the 21st Century”. Keynote Paper to 1st International Conference on Assessing Quality in High Education, Lahore, 11-13 December.