ABSTRACT: Formative Assessment (FA) and Summative Assessment (SA) constitute two indispensable parts of any effective assessment system. As FA was proposed as an alternative to SA, there has been an academic concern about their relationship since the birth of these two concepts. Although many well-known studies have been carried out for FA, or, SA, or both, there has been contrasting views and misunderstandings about the relationship between FA and SA. It is argued in this paper that the confused relationship between FA and SA stems from the fact that it is either conceptualized from the perspective of function or from the perspective of process alone. The relation between FA and SA is very fine, far from clear-cut and a clarified relation between them is necessary for both our right understanding of FA and SA as well as the realization of the balance between FA and SA in practice as advocated by many educational policies. This paper aims to: (1) carry out an analysis of the function-based perspective and process-based perspective; and (2) re-conceptualize the relationship between them by combining the two perspectives together. The study results suggest that: (1) both FA and SA are, first of all, assessment and therefore share the same neutral assessment processes of elicitation of learning evidence, interpretation of evidence, and use of assessment results; (2) the purpose governs the how each process should be carried out and the extent to which summative or formative function is performed depends the how the processes are carried out; and (3) formative use of SA is more feasible than summative use of FA in practice.

KEY WORDS: Relationship between formative assessments, function perspective, process perspective, contrasting views, misunderstandings, and re-conceptualize.

About the Author: Huang Jian is a Lecturer at the School of Foreign Studies CUFE (Central University of Finance and Economics) in Beijing, China. Address: 39 South College Road, Haidian District, Beijing, People Republic of China, 100081. E-mail: summerofhj@sina.com

How to cite this article? Jian, Huang. (2015). “Reconceptualization of the Relationship between Formative Assessment and Summative Assessment” in EDUCARE: International Journal for Educational Studies, Vol.8(1) August, pp.1-10. Bandung, Indonesia: Minda Masagi Press and UMP Purwokerto, ISSN 1979-7877.

Chronicle of the article: Accepted (February 16, 2015); Revised (April 21, 2015); and Published (August 25, 2015).

relationship between formative assessments; function perspective; process perspective; contrasting views; misunderstandings; re-conceptualize

Bachman, L. (2004). Statistical Analyses for Language Assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bennett, R.E. (2011). “Formative Assessment: A Critical Review” in Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 1, pp.5-25.

Biggs, J. (1998). “Assessment and Classroom Learning: A Role for Summative Assessment?” in Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), pp.103-110.

Bloom, B.S., J.T. Hastings & G.F. Madaus [eds]. (1971). Handbook on the Formative and Summative Evaluation of Student Learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Black, P.J. & D. Wiliam. (1998a). “Assessment and Classroom Learning” in Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), pp.7-74.

Black, P.J. & D. Wiliam. (1998b). “Inside the Black Box: Raising Standards Through Classroom Assessment” in The Phi Delta Kappan, 80(2), pp.81-90.

Black, P.J. & D. Wiliam. (2003). “In Praise of Educational Research: Formative Assessment” in British Educational Research Journal, 29(5), pp.623-637.

Black, P. & D. Wiliam. (2009). “Developing the Theory of Formative Assessment” in Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), pp.5-31.

Cao, R. (2012). Towards a Reconceptualization of Formative Assessment. Beijing: Peiking University Press.

Coffield, F. & S. Edwards. (2009). “Rolling Out ‘Good’, ‘Best’ and ‘Excellent’ Practice: What Next? Perfect Practice?” in British Educational Research Journal, 35(3), pp.371-90.

Huang, J. & S. Luo. (2014). “Formative Assessment in L2 Classroom in China: The Current Situation, Predicament, and Future” in IJAL: Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 3(2), pp.18-34.

Nicol, D. & D. Macfarlane-Dick. (2006). “Formative Assessment and Self-Regulated Learning: A Model and Seven Principles of Good Feedback Practice” in Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), pp.199-218.

Popham, W.J. (2008). Transformative Assessment. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

Popham, W.J. (2011). Classroom Assessment: What Teachers Need to Know. Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc., 6th edition.

Sadler, D.R. (1989). “Formative Assessment and the Design of Instructional Systems” in Instructional Science, 18(2), pp.119-144.

Scriven, M. (1967). “The Methodology of Evaluation” in R.W. Tyler, R.M. Gagne & M. Scriven [eds]. Perspectives on Curriculum Evaluation. Chicago: Rand McNally, pp.39-83.

Stobart, G. (2008). Testing Times: The Uses and Abuses of Assessment. New York: Routledge.

Stronach, I. (1996). “Fashioning Post-Modernism, Finishing Modernism: Tales from the Fitting Room” in British Educational Research Journal, 22(3), pp.359-373.

Taras, M. (2005). “Assessment — Summative and Formative — Some Theoretical Reflections” in British Journal of Educational Studies, 53(4), pp.466-478.

Taras, M. (2006). “Do Unto Others or Not? Lecturers Use Expert Feedback on Research Articles, Why Not Likewise Undergraduates on Assessed Work?” in Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(3), pp.363-375.

Taras, M. (2007). “Machinations of Assessment: Metaphors, Myths, and Realities” in Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 15(1), pp.55-69.

Taras, M. (2010). “Back to Basics: Definitions and Processes of Assessments” in Práxis Educativa: Ponta Grossa, 5(2), pp.123-130. Available online also at: http://www.revistas2.uepg.br/index.php/praxiseducativa/article/view/1829/1386R [accessed in Beijing, China: October 6, 2014].

Wiliam, D. (2011). Embedded Formative Assessment. Bloomington: Solution Tree.

Wiliam, D. & P. Black. (1996). “Meanings and Consequences: A Basis for Distinguishing Formative and Summative Functions of Assessment?” in British Educational Research Journal, 22(5), pp.537-548.

Yang, H. (2012). “A Study of Real-Time Formative Assessment by Chinese University EFL Teachers”. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation. Beijing: Beijing Foreign Studies University.