IKHTISAR: Kajian ini bertujuan untuk membuat perbandingan prestasi pengajaran dan pembelajaran guru-guru Sains di sekolah menengah bandar dan luar bandar dari aspek perbezaan min yang signifikan mengikut subjek Sains yang diajar, jawatan, bahasa, dan pendekatan pengajaran dan pembelajaran bagi kategori sekolah menengah bandar dan luar bandar. Disamping itu juga, penyelidik mengkaji hubungan yang signifikan dan juga pengaruh antara umur dan pengalaman mengajar subjek major terhadap prestasi pengajaran dan pembelajaran guru-guru Sains. Keputusan ANOVA sehala menunjukkan terdapatnya perbezaan yang signifikan antara pendekatan pengajaran dan pembelajaran dengan prestasi pengajaran dan pembelajaran guru-guru Sains di sekolah menengah bandar. Keputusan Korelasi Pearson pula mendapati terdapat hubungan signifikan antara umur dengan prestasi pengajaran dan pembelajaran guru-guru Sains (r = .133, k < 0.05) dengan kekuatan korelasinya yang lemah. Dapatan yang sama diperolehi hubungan antara pengalaman mengajar subjek major dengan prestasi pengajaran dan pembelajaran (r = .140, k < 0.05). Selanjutnya, keputusan analisis Regresi Sehala mendapati terdapat pengaruh yang signifikan antara pengalaman mengajar subjek major dengan prestasi pengajaran dan pembelajaran guru-guru Sains [R² (1.236) = .020, F = 4.858, k < 0.05].

KATA KUNCI: Perbandingan, prestasi pengajaran dan pembelajaran, guru Sains, sekolah menengah bandar dan luar bandar, serta umur dan pengalaman mengajar.

ABSTRACT: “A Comparison of Teaching and Learning Performances among Urban and Rural Secondary School of Science Teachers in Sabah, Malaysia”. This research aims to compare the teaching and learning performance of urban and rural secondary school of Science teachers from the aspect of mean difference significance according to the Science subjects taught, position, language, and teaching and learning approaches for the category of urban school and rural school. Besides that, researchers also study the relationships which are significant and the effects of age and teaching experience of major subject to the teaching and learning performance of Science teachers. The result of one-way ANOVA showed that there was significant difference between teaching and learning approaches to teaching and learning performance of urban school Science teachers. The result of Pearson Correlation indicated that there was significant relation between age and teaching and learning performance of Science teachers (r = .133, k < 0.05) which was a weak correlation. Same output was obtained for the relation between teaching experience of major subject and performance of teaching and learning (r = .140, k < 0.05). Furthermore, the result of analysis of one-way Regression indicated that there was significant effect between teaching experience of major subject and teaching and learning performance of Science teachers [R² (1.236) = .020, F = 4.858, k < 0.05].

KEY WORD: Comparison, teaching and learning performance, Science teacher, urban and rural secondary schools, and age and teaching experience.

About the Authors: Crispina Gregory K. Han & Dr. Chin Kin Eng @ Sporty Chin ialah Pensyarah di Fakulti Psikologi dan Pendidikan UMS (Universiti Malaysia Sabah), Jalan UMS, 88400 Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia. Bagi urusan sebarang akademik, penulis boleh dihubungi dengan alamat emel: crispinagregory@gmail.com

How to cite this article? Gregory K. Han, Crispina & Chin Kin Eng @ Sporty Chin. (2014). “Perbandingan Prestasi Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran dalam Kalangan Guru-guru Sains Sekolah Menengah Bandar dan Luar Bandar di Sabah, Malaysia” in ATIKAN: Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan, Vol.4(2) December, pp.263-274. Bandung, Indonesia: Minda Masagi Press, FKIP UNSUR Cianjur, and FPOK UPI Bandung, ISSN 2088-1290.

Chronicle of the article: Accepted (August 20, 2014); Revised (September 27, 2014); and Published (December 27, 2014).

Abd Ghafar, Mohd Najib. (1998). Penyelidikan Pendidikan. Skudai, Johor: Penerbit UTM [Universiti Teknologi Malaysia].

Abdul Samad, Khalid. (2008). “Mengembalikan Pengajaran-Pembelajaran Sains dan Matematik dalam Bahasa Ibunda di Sekolah Rendah”. Tersedia juga di atas talian: http://www.djz.edu.my/resource/math/PDF/speech_070708_09.pdf [diakses di Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia: 15hb Oktober 2014].

Alwiah Alsagoff, Sharifah. (1987). Ilmu Pendidikan Pedagogi. Kuala Lumpur: Heinemann Asia.

Bruner, J.S. (1966). Toward a Theory of Instruction. Cambridge, Mass: The Belknap Press.

Davies, J.A. (1971). Elementary Survey Analysis. Englewood, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Hanim, Zaenab et al. (2004). “Penggunaan Kaedah Pembelajaran Koperatif (PK) dalam Pengajaran Matematik” dalam Jurnal Pendidikan, 29, ms.105-124.

Hull, D. (1999). Teaching Science Contextually: The Cornerstone of Tech Prep. USA: Cord Communication, Inc.

Kagan, Spencer. (1994). Cooperative Learning. USA: University of Virginia Press.

Kerlinger, Fred N. (1973). Fondation of Behavioral Research. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc., second edition.

KPM [Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia]. (2000). Proses Pengajaran Guru Sains kepada Pelajar Berpencapaian Rendah dalam Mata Pelajaran Sains. Kuala Lumpur: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. Tersedia juga atas talian di: http://apps.emoe.gov.my/bppdp/Kajian%20BPPDP/2000/2000%20(7)%20Proses%20pengajaran%20guru% [diakses di Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia: 9hb Oktober 2014].

McMillan, J.H. & S. Schumacher. (2001). Research in Education. New York: Longman, Inc.

Mohd Ibrahim, Mohd Kassim. (2003). “Perkaitan Gaya Kepimpinan Pengetua dengan Kepuasan Kerja dan Pengajaran Guru”. Tesis Ph.D. Tidak Diterbitkan. Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia: UMS [Universiti Malaysia Sabah].

Mohd Noah, Sidek. (2002). Reka Bentuk Penyelidikan: Falsafah, Teori, dan Praktis. Serdang: UPM [Universiti Putra Malaysia].

Panitz, T. & P. Panitz. (1998). Encouraging the Use of Collaborative Learning in Higher Education: Issues Facing International Education. New York: Garland Publishing.

Slavin, Robert. (2008). Cooperative Learning: Teori, Riset, dan Praktik. Bandung, Indonesia: Nusa Media, Terjemahan.